From Gentle to FAFO: How Parenting Styles Shape Resilience
- Brad Sorte

- Jan 4
- 6 min read

Introduction
In July 2025, the Wall Street Journal highlighted a new buzzword in parenting: “FAFO,” an acronym for “fool around and find out.” While the term is playful, it points to a serious debate about discipline and emotional development.
Many parents who embrace gentle parenting find themselves sliding into permissive habits that leave children without clear boundaries. Others are calling for a return to firmer approaches that encourage children to experience the natural consequences of their choices.
This blog explores why permissive parenting can be detrimental to child development, how gentle parenting is often misunderstood, and why authoritative or FAFO‑style discipline may cultivate resilience and anti‑fragility in the next generation.
Understanding Parenting Styles
Psychologists have long studied parenting styles along two dimensions: warmth and control.
Permissive parenting is high on warmth but low on demands. These parents are nurturing and affectionate yet provide few rules or expectations, often acting more like friends than authority figures. Discipline is rare and inconsistent, and bribery may be used to elicit cooperation.
Gentle parenting, when properly practiced, falls under the broader “authoritative” umbrella; it combines empathy and respect with firm limits and guidance. Its emphasis is on validating emotions and teaching rather than punishing.
Authoritative parenting, also called the tender teacher approach, balances high warmth with clear, consistent boundaries. Parents explain rules, encourage autonomy, and use logical consequences to teach accountability.
FAFO parenting is a modern label for this evidence‑based approach; it emphasizes letting children experience age‑appropriate natural consequences while remaining compassionate and supportive.
Developmental Risks of Permissive Parenting
Permissive households can feel loving, but research highlights significant developmental downsides. Children raised in these environments often lack self‑discipline because expectations for mature behaviour are minimal. The absence of consistent rules means they receive little training in time management or problem‑solving.
Studies link permissive parenting to lower academic achievement since parents have few demands for effort and follow‑through. These children may also develop poor social skills and become self‑involved or demanding due to insufficient boundaries. Without practice at tolerating frustration, they can struggle with emotional regulation and may engage in riskier behaviours, including misconduct and substance use.
The lack of structure may even contribute to unhealthy habits such as excessive screen time or overeating.
While permissive parenting offers warmth and self‑esteem benefits, the long‑term costs in discipline and social competence are considerable.

When Gentle Parenting Becomes Permissive
Many caregivers embrace gentle parenting because they want to avoid the harshness or control of authoritarian models. Yet gentle parenting is often misinterpreted as never saying “no.” An Atlantic Health therapist notes that many parents mistakenly think gentle parenting is about letting children do as they please. Psychology Today explains that gentle parenting is authoritative at its core; it is gentle in that it avoids punitive measures, not gentle in the sense of lacking demands.
Without clear guidance on balancing empathy with limits, overwhelmed parents may default to appeasing behaviour. Fatigue, stress and fear of damaging a child’s self‑esteem can make it hard to hold firm when a toddler screams or a teenager negotiates. In the age of social media, sound bites promoting “respect their feelings” can drown out the equally important message of establishing boundaries. The result is a permissive environment that undermines the very emotional security gentle parenting intends to create.
Why Authoritative/FAFO Parenting Builds Anti‑Fragile Children
Authoritative parenting has been shown to produce some of the best long‑term outcomes for children. This style blends responsiveness and warmth with clear expectations and logical consequences. Children raised in such homes tend to be confident, self‑disciplined, socially skilled, and emotionally resilient. They also perform better academically, particularly in reading, writing, and mathematics, compared with peers raised in more authoritarian or permissive environments.
FAFO parenting applies the authoritative framework in everyday situations. When a child refuses to do homework, there is no screen time later; if they leave a jacket behind, they may feel cold. These are not punishments but natural outcomes that help children connect behaviour with responsibility.
Experts emphasize that allowing children to face the consequences of their actions builds resilience and problem‑solving skills. It encourages accountability and reduces power struggles because children are in charge of their decisions. By preparing kids for real‑world cause and effect, FAFO parenting strengthens their capacity to adapt and thrive—traits central to the concept of anti‑fragility.
How Different Styles Respond: Three Scenarios
To illustrate how parenting styles shape a child’s psyche, consider how each approach handles common situations:
Bedtime Battle
Permissive: Parent yields to the child’s protests and allows bedtime to slide. The child learns that persistence brings desired outcomes and develops poor sleep habits. Consistency is lacking, and anxiety may increase because the child does not know what to expect.
Gentle: Parent empathizes with the child’s desire to stay up and may co‑regulate by sitting with them until they are ready. The child feels seen but may lack routine if the parent does not enforce a bedtime.
Authoritative/FAFO: Parent validates feelings (“I know you’re having fun”) but reinforces that it is bedtime. They might offer a choice between two books and then light out. The child learns to respect routine and understands that empathy and structure can coexist.
Refusing Homework
Permissive: Parent ignores the refusal or eventually does the homework for the child. The child internalizes that avoiding hard tasks has no consequences and may struggle with self‑discipline.
Gentle: Parent explores why the child is resisting—perhaps they are tired or confused—and offers help. If the parent does not insist on completion, the child might not develop perseverance.
Authoritative/FAFO: Parent assists with problem‑solving but maintains that homework must be completed before screen time or play. The natural consequence of missing out on a privilege teaches that effort yields rewards.
Being Rude to a Friend
Permissive: The parent may excuse the behaviour as a phase or avoid confrontation. The child misses the opportunity to learn empathy and accountability.
Gentle: Parent discusses feelings and encourages an apology, but might not require restitution. The child receives guidance but may not fully grasp the impact of their actions.
Authoritative/FAFO: Parent halts play until the child can speak respectfully, explaining that friends may not want to play with someone who is unkind. This logical consequence helps the child understand social responsibility and builds prosocial behaviour.
These scenarios show that while permissive parenting prioritizes harmony, it often fails to teach self‑control. Gentle parenting offers emotional support, but may struggle without clear limits. Authoritative/FAFO parenting balances empathy with boundaries, enabling children to develop internal discipline and healthy social skills.

Making the Switch: From Permissive to Authoritative
Shifting from permissive or misapplied gentle parenting to an authoritative/FAFO style requires self‑reflection and gradual change.
Consider these steps:
Regulate Yourself First. Children depend on regulated adults to help them co‑regulate. Practices like mindfulness, therapy, or support groups can help parents manage their own reactions and avoid appeasing behaviours.
Clarify Your Values and Expectations. Create a short list of non‑negotiable rules and communicate them clearly. For example, bedtime, homework, and respectful speech may be core expectations.
Follow Through Consistently. Consistency is the hardest part for permissive parents. If the consequence for not completing homework is no screen time, enforce it calmly every time. Predictability fosters security and teaches cause and effect.
Use Natural and Logical Consequences. Align consequences with actions: if a child forgets a coat, they feel cold; if they break a toy, they help repair or replace it. Avoid punitive measures that shame; the goal is learning, not suffering.
Balance Empathy With Boundaries. Validate feelings while holding the limit. Explain the rationale behind rules and offer choices within boundaries to encourage autonomy.
Seek Education and Support. Parenting classes, coaching, and evidence‑based resources can provide tools and confidence to implement authoritative strategies. Connecting with other caregivers can reduce isolation and reinforce consistent practices.
Implementing these steps can feel uncomfortable at first, especially if you fear upsetting your child. Remember that a brief tantrum over a limit is preferable to long‑term difficulties with self‑regulation or entitlement. Over time, children learn that you are reliable, compassionate, and firm; a combination that fosters secure attachment and resilience.

Conclusion: How Parenting Styles Shape Resilience
The current fascination with FAFO parenting underscores a cultural shift away from unstructured permissiveness. Research shows that permissive parenting—though warm—often leaves children without the tools to manage frustration, achieve goals, and navigate social relationships. Gentle parenting, when properly understood, is not permissive; it is a branch of authoritative parenting that combines empathy with structure.
Authoritative or FAFO parenting, grounded in natural and logical consequences, helps children build resilience, accountability, and self‑discipline.
By making the switch from permissive habits to a firm‑and‑kind approach, caregivers can raise children who are not only emotionally secure but also anti‑fragile—capable of thriving amid the challenges of an unpredictable world.




Comments